Government run only by members of Abnegation?

Discuss the June 2014 book of the month Divergent by Veronica Roth. While only Divergent--the first book of the series--is the book of the month, feel free to use this subforum to discuss the rest of the series or to talk about the movies, but make sure not to post spoilers unless noted in the topic title.
Post Reply
Atara Miles
Posts: 212
Joined: 22 Sep 2019, 17:26
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 16
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-atara-miles.html
Latest Review: Days of the Giants by RJ Petrella

Re: Government run only by members of Abnegation?

Post by Atara Miles »

Since it came down to it, Abnegation really was the best choice for a ruling faction, though I still think each faction should have been given a spot to balance it out. Abnegation is selfless, so out of the five they had more of a positive implication and would be less rash when making city decisions.
Barbara Larkin
Posts: 243
Joined: 03 Mar 2020, 22:04
Currently Reading: The Raven Boys
Bookshelf Size: 55
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-barbara-larkin.html
Latest Review: We are Voulhire: The Flesh of the Mind by Matthew Tysz

Post by Barbara Larkin »

I feel any institution run by a single faction, no matter their ideals, will act in the best interest of that faction. Selflessness might be a quality sought out in leaders, but that excludes the possibility of unity.
User avatar
Dzejn_Crvena
Posts: 1140
Joined: 20 Jan 2021, 02:17
Favorite Book: The Greater Understanding
Currently Reading: The Wish List
Bookshelf Size: 2316
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-dzejn-crvena.html
Latest Review: Serendipity Mystery: Diary of a Snoopy Cat by R.F. Kristi

Post by Dzejn_Crvena »

Scott wrote: 03 Jun 2014, 13:21 Do you agree with her father’s statement that “valuing knowledge above all else results in a lust for power, and that leads men into dark and empty places” (p. 35)? Why or why not?
I do not agree with the statement, because some mad scientists only care about the perfection of the knowledge they pursue. They do not always have to drag other people into their madness. Maybe that quote would fit into the unhealthy Abnegation type. Some self-righteous people think they're doing you a favor by doing things for your sake that they consider as "saving" you.

I regard Abnegation as related to temperance, which is necessary for keeping everything balanced. If unhealthy Abnegations rule a faction, Tris would be surrounded by overcontrolling leaders. But with healthy Abnegation leaders, a Faction will run smoothly if the followers cooperate and set aside selfish desires. Of course, it's just an idealization. In reality, it is difficult to maintain a community where everyone agrees to everything. I agree when others say that a good leader should also be courageous, wise, honest, and harmonious.
just call me "jane" :tiphat:
Janet Kimetto
Previous Member of the Month
Posts: 1080
Joined: 12 Jan 2021, 15:24
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 81
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-janet-kimetto.html
Latest Review: Zona: The Forbidden Land by Fred G. Baker

Post by Janet Kimetto »

Abnegation was the best choice from what they had to choose from. But what I really think is that the divergent should have been made leaders (were the situation different) because they have a little bit of everything in them. Leaders should have more qualities than just being selfless.
“Be wary. Be clever. Be good.”
Rachel Gillig, One Dark Window
User avatar
Clare Jose
Book of the Month Participant
Posts: 759
Joined: 17 Mar 2021, 23:01
Favorite Book: Let's Pretend This Never Happened
Currently Reading: Pride and Prejudice
Bookshelf Size: 196
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-clare-jose.html
Latest Review: Not Fishy Enough by Briton Kolber

Post by Clare Jose »

Scott wrote: 03 Jun 2014, 13:21 The following discussion question was included in some copies of the June book of the month, Divergent by Veronica Roth.

Why is Tris’s government run only by members of Abnegation? Do you think this is a good idea? Do you agree with her father’s statement that “valuing knowledge above all else results in a lust for power, and that leads men into dark and empty places” (p. 35)? Why or why not?
Abnegation was chosen to run the government since they were selfless and could put the needs of other factions before their personal needs. It does seems an ideal solution, but other factions might feel as if they have no choice in many matters and this might build resentment towards Abnegation. which is why I think the government should have had representatives from each faction.

As for Tris's father's statement, I agree with it. Knowledge should be gained but it should be for the right reasons.
Life is short, break the rules, forgive quickly, kiss slowly, love truly, laugh uncontrollably, and never regret anything that made you smile."
kirthana_shivakumar
Posts: 250
Joined: 10 Jul 2021, 05:26
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 36
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-kirthana-shivakumar.html
Latest Review: Depiction of women characters as Victims of Oppresion and Agents of action in selected short stories by Rushika Gill

Post by kirthana_shivakumar »

I think assuming that selflessness is all that's needed to run a country is naive. There are a lot of intelligent (knowledge-based) decisions and so Erudite shouldn't be kept out of it. And a lust for knowledge isn't selfish or bad.
User avatar
jimmy02
Posts: 251
Joined: 03 Feb 2022, 12:25
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 23
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jimmy02.html
Latest Review: A Dream For Peace by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah

Post by jimmy02 »

Being a leader with just goodwill of your people in your heart doesn't cut it. Occasionally, a leader needs to make hard and difficult choices. That's what is lacking in an Abnegation lead administration.
There is no friend as loyal as a book.
~ Ernst Hemingway

:techie-studyingbrown:
User avatar
Inks and Quills
Posts: 80
Joined: 22 Feb 2022, 22:12
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 20
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-inks-and-quills.html
Latest Review: Shadow's Adventure Home by Kathy Kovar

Post by Inks and Quills »

I understand where the thought came from since they are all selfless. However multiple viewpoints are needed for any governing body.
User avatar
AlphariusRE
Posts: 135
Joined: 06 Mar 2022, 08:38
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 15
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-alphariusre.html
Latest Review: Kalayla by Jeannie Nicholas

Post by AlphariusRE »

I feel that without valuing knowledge above all, we can't progress as a society. A government run by Abnegation will be like that. Peaceful maybe, but stagnant (leading to decline) definitely.
Simmons32
Posts: 254
Joined: 28 Mar 2022, 20:51
Currently Reading: Cengage Advantage Books
Bookshelf Size: 673
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-simmons32.html
Latest Review: Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute by Jeff Meyer

Post by Simmons32 »

I do not agree with their government being run only by Abnegation. It should be a member from each faction in order to keep things fair for all of them. Unfortunately, I can understand how there is no trust between Abnegation and other factions. It's not a matter of Abnegation being good people. Most of them are good people, but there are good people in the other factions too. That's why they all should be represented. Maybe issues could have been avoided if this had been the case. There might have been more trust between the factions.
User avatar
Loniya Chabili Mubanga
Posts: 443
Joined: 04 Jul 2022, 00:03
Currently Reading: The sea keepers daughter
Bookshelf Size: 254
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-loniya-chabili-mubanga.html
Latest Review: American Dream? by Jeoung Lee

Post by Loniya Chabili Mubanga »

Whichever faction would have been in power, everyone would have been doomed regardless. That's what happens when you give humans power to govern themselves: chaos. So even the selfless Abnegation would have found a way to mess it up. Just a matter of time
I'm here for a good time, not a long time. Yolo!
User avatar
Bettny Andrade
Book of the Month Participant
Posts: 827
Joined: 23 Feb 2022, 10:57
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 126
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-bettny-andrade.html
Latest Review: The Doomsday Clock by Mark Pearson

Post by Bettny Andrade »

From my point of view, each faction should intervene. However, in the divergent world it makes a lot of sense, since according to their divisions, Abnegation is the ideal one to carry out these tasks.
Krishi Shah
Posts: 143
Joined: 19 Jul 2022, 06:17
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 106
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-krishi-shah.html
Latest Review: My Trip To Adele by R.I.Alyaseer and A. I Alyaseer

Post by Krishi Shah »

I don't think any one faction should have so much power. There should be a committee with a leader representing every faction.
Krishi Shah
Posts: 143
Joined: 19 Jul 2022, 06:17
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 106
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-krishi-shah.html
Latest Review: My Trip To Adele by R.I.Alyaseer and A. I Alyaseer

Post by Krishi Shah »

I wonder if their own faction would suffer because of their extreme selflessness.
Krishi Shah
Posts: 143
Joined: 19 Jul 2022, 06:17
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 106
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-krishi-shah.html
Latest Review: My Trip To Adele by R.I.Alyaseer and A. I Alyaseer

Post by Krishi Shah »

To be fair, we didn't see a single Abnegation member who was worthy of such a post. For a community that is supposedly selfless, everyone seemed short sighted and selfish.
Post Reply

Return to “"Divergent" by Veronica Roth”