The Origins Debate, an article by Daniel Friedmann
Moderators: bookowlie, Special Discussion Leaders
- friedmanndaniel
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 11 Jan 2015, 20:27
- Bookshelf Size: 0
The Origins Debate, an article by Daniel Friedmann
The Origins Debate
The origins debate is a recurring cultural, political, and theological dispute about the origins of the Earth, life, humanity, and the universe. Is there an approach to the debate that can be accepted by scientists and theologists?
The dispute continues between those who espouse religious belief and thus support a creationist view, and those who accept that purely materialistic scientific theories explain, or in time will explain, all aspects of the origins of the universe, life, and humans.
Creationism is the religious belief that the universe and living organisms originated from specific acts of divine creation. It includes a continuum of views on scripture and science. On scripture, perspectives range from a literal to a figurative interpretation of Genesis. On science, views vary in their acceptance or rejection of scientific explanations, such as evolution, and measurement techniques, such as radioactive decay for estimating the age of fossils.
In America, the general public remains divided on the origins debate. A 2019 Gallup poll indicated 40% of adult Americans hold that God created humans in their present form, 33% hold that humans evolved, with God guiding the process, and 22% believe that humans evolved with God playing no part in it.
Creationists have made many attempts to formulate arguments that scientists can accept, so as to work towards a resolution. Early on, scientific creationists failed to show that their arguments held up to scientific scrutiny. Today, the intelligent design movement argues from scientific principles that certain events in the development of the universe and life required an intelligence in order to happen. But the scientific community does not agree that intelligent design is “scientific,” because the creator can be made to do anything, so the theory does not predict anything specific and thus cannot be tested.
The scientific community’s reaction to intelligent design makes it clear that progress in the debate requires creationism to be backed up by an approach that is testable and thus acceptable as “scientific.” This approach must therefore include explanations and predictions of aspects of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested and verified, in accordance with the scientific method.
Can the creationism argument be made scientifically testable? Yes, by checking the record that the Creator left behind, a set of documents that can be analyzed and put to the test. God, as the designer of the universe, left behind just such a record—the books of the Bible. Even if one does not hold that the record is divine, it is a fact, nonetheless, that it precedes all modern science and origins explanations. If this record (1) is detailed enough to explain the origins of the universe and life, (2) does this in a way that does not contradict clear scientific facts yet adds to the natural explanation precisely where science struggles, and (3) contains information unknown to scientists that can be verified in the future by experiment and/or observation, then it fits scientists’ need for a “testable theory.”
The Biblical Clock is based on this approach.
---
View The Biblical Clock on Amazon
- tollivsr
- Posts: 13
- Joined: 24 Feb 2021, 21:50
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 12
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-tollivsr.html
- Latest Review: High Flying by Kaylin McFarren
- Nonu9Nov
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 03 Oct 2020, 09:32
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- ADIFRANCIS1966
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 02 Jul 2020, 09:34
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- M Holden
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 01 Nov 2020, 17:09
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 3
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-m-holden.html
- Latest Review: The Biblical Clock by Daniel Friedmann and Dania Sheldon
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 05 Nov 2020, 13:47
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 4
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-kimby127.html
- Latest Review: How To Be Successful by M. Curtis McCoy
- Mummylove65
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 10 Jan 2021, 07:01
- Currently Reading: Asterisk
- Bookshelf Size: 107
-
- Posts: 999
- Joined: 20 Jan 2021, 05:00
- Favorite Book: Money Faucet
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 189
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-francis-aderogbin.html
- Latest Review: Donny and Mary Grace's California Adventures by Catherine A. Pepe
- Oumousayon
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 06 Mar 2021, 15:10
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- B Sheila Holt
- In It Together VIP
- Posts: 966
- Joined: 03 Oct 2020, 01:32
- Currently Reading: One Christmas Eve
- Bookshelf Size: 85
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-b-sheila-holt.html
- Latest Review: Open Heart by Akil Taher
Until this book, I had never heard of “creationism” before. I believe in the facts from the Bible, but also enjoy learning about and exploring new things and things I’ve never heard of before. Your article has given me a great curiosity to research and study on this topic for a while. I’m amazed at how many are part of this belief system. Thank you for a greatly detailed, very interesting review.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 10 Jan 2021, 07:44
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 20
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-kimjoy22.html
- Latest Review: White Night by J.J. Holt
- Pandora10
- Posts: 700
- Joined: 23 Nov 2020, 07:54
- Favorite Book: Remembering Christmas
- Currently Reading: The Road to Management
- Bookshelf Size: 116
- bookowlie
- Special Discussion Leader
- Posts: 9071
- Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 09:52
- Favorite Book: The Lost Continent
- Currently Reading: The Night She Went Missing
- Bookshelf Size: 442
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-bookowlie.html
- Latest Review: To Paint A Murder by E. J. Gandolfo
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 09 Mar 2021, 17:39
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Michael du Preez
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 04 Mar 2021, 07:25
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 0
I personally believe that every word Jesus uttered was the truth. The claims He made about himself were either the truth, or they were the claims of a lunatic. He certainly believed in the Scriptures, the predictions, the explanations and the future of mankind. He believed in Angels and Demons and in Heaven as an eternal existence for the souls of those who believe in Him, our Three-in One, Creator, God.
Eye-witness accounts of the Deity of Jesus, such as His death and resurrection plus the myriad miracles he performed, are beyond dispute. If scientists really have to explain everything, should they not thoroughly research the Scriptures first, and diligently search for answers there, before they make assumptions and question the existence of a Grand Designer, God?