Which or That?

Some grammar rules (and embarrassing mistakes!) transcend the uniqueness of different regions and style guides. This new International Grammar section by OnlineBookClub.org ultimately identifies those rules thus providing a simple, flexible rule-set, respecting the differences between regions and style guides. You can feel free to ask general questions about spelling and grammar. You can also provide example sentences for other members to proofread and inform you of any grammar mistakes.

Moderator: Official Reviewer Representatives

Post Reply
Han26+
Posts: 328
Joined: 16 Mar 2019, 05:42
Currently Reading: The DC Comics Encyclopedia
Bookshelf Size: 52
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-han26.html
Latest Review: Man Mission by Eytan Uliel

Which or That?

Post by Han26+ »

When is the use of “which” correct, and when is the use of “that” correct? I’ve an inkling they are not interchangeable.
User avatar
Fazzier
Posts: 783
Joined: 16 Jan 2019, 14:07
Currently Reading: Secondary Break
Bookshelf Size: 547
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-fazzier.html
Latest Review: Planning for a Better, Greener Future by Peter Nelson

Post by Fazzier »

I've always used 'which' and 'that' interchangeably. Do they have any difference?
User avatar
EvaDar
Previous Member of the Month
Posts: 2295
Joined: 18 Nov 2017, 11:21
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 122
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-evadar.html
Latest Review: Do Not Wish For A Pet Ostrich! by Sarina Siebenaler

Post by EvaDar »

This question has to do with restrictive and non-restrictive clauses. The following link is good as it addresses British and American styles. Basically, if the clause contains essential information (restrictive), that would be used. If non-essential (non-restrictive), then which is used. With which, a comma is usually needed.

The backpack that was found on the bus was red.
The clause that contains that is essential. If you remove the clause, the meaning of the sentence is not conveyed correctly.
The backpack was red.
The sentence is still grammatically correct, but it is not enough information. It is essential (restrictive) information that the backpack was found on the bus. Both elements are important and tell us that it was a red backpack that was found on the bus.

The backpack, which is red, was found on the bus.
This tells us a back pack was found on the bus, and the fact that it is red is additional information. The point is it was left on the bus. You can remove the which clause and the sentence still conveys the information correctly (non-restrictive).
The backpack was found on the bus.

This link has more detail:
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/usage/that-or-which
sit in the ocean. it is one of the best medicines on the planet. – the water
-Nayyirah Waheed
User avatar
Dawud Adaviruku
Posts: 321
Joined: 26 Feb 2019, 15:31
Currently Reading: Holding Fire
Bookshelf Size: 94
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-dawud-adaviruku.html
Latest Review: Reconfigurement by E. Alan Fleischauer

Post by Dawud Adaviruku »

Eva Darrington wrote: 17 Mar 2019, 14:41 This question has to do with restrictive and non-restrictive clauses. The following link is good as it addresses British and American styles. Basically, if the clause contains essential information (restrictive), that would be used. If non-essential (non-restrictive), then which is used. With which, a comma is usually needed.

The backpack that was found on the bus was red.
The clause that contains that is essential. If you remove the clause, the meaning of the sentence is not conveyed correctly.
The backpack was red.
The sentence is still grammatically correct, but it is not enough information. It is essential (restrictive) information that the backpack was found on the bus. Both elements are important and tell us that it was a red backpack that was found on the bus.

The backpack, which is red, was found on the bus.
This tells us a back pack was found on the bus, and the fact that it is red is additional information. The point is it was left on the bus. You can remove the which clause and the sentence still conveys the information correctly (non-restrictive).
The backpack was found on the bus.

This link has more detail:
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/usage/that-or-which
Thank you for sharing this detailed explanations. It's great.
User avatar
Renu G
Posts: 753
Joined: 06 Mar 2019, 01:32
Currently Reading: Masters and Bastards
Bookshelf Size: 144
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-renu-g.html
Latest Review: The Roving Mind: A Modern Approach to Cognitive Enhancement by Anthony Simola

Post by Renu G »

This is very helpful. Thank you very much. I think one can get a doctorate in English grammar by becoming a good reviewer for OBC! :techie-reference:
User avatar
roxy60sweet
Posts: 3
Joined: 27 Feb 2018, 13:00
Currently Reading: The Mistress
Bookshelf Size: 14

Post by roxy60sweet »

'That' should always precede a restrictive or defining clause. 'Which' should always precede a non-restrictive or nondefining clause and be preceded by a comma.
User avatar
Bukari
Posts: 567
Joined: 04 Feb 2018, 15:59
Currently Reading: Everything Solid Has a Shadow
Bookshelf Size: 99
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-bukari.html
Latest Review: Days of the Giants by RJ Petrella

Post by Bukari »

Thanks for the clarification, but the inclusion of a comma after "which" is still controversial among most editors.
"Ever Tried. Ever Failed. No Matter. Try Again. Fail Again. Fail Better." - Samuel Beckett.
Agnes Masobeng
Posts: 837
Joined: 24 Dec 2018, 03:20
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 424
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-agnes-masobeng.html
Latest Review: Man Mission by Eytan Uliel

Post by Agnes Masobeng »

EvaDar wrote: 17 Mar 2019, 14:41 This question has to do with restrictive and non-restrictive clauses. The following link is good as it addresses British and American styles. Basically, if the clause contains essential information (restrictive), that would be used. If non-essential (non-restrictive), then which is used. With which, a comma is usually needed.
The backpack that was found on the bus was red.
The clause that contains that is essential. If you remove the clause, the meaning of the sentence is not conveyed correctly.
The backpack was red.
The sentence is still grammatically correct, but it is not enough information. It is essential (restrictive) information that the backpack was found on the bus. Both elements are important and tell us that it was a red backpack that was found on the bus.

The backpack, which is red, was found on the bus.
This tells us a back pack was found on the bus, and the fact that it is red is additional information. The point is it was left on the bus. You can remove the which clause and the sentence still conveys the information correctly (non-restrictive).
The backpack was found on the bus.

This link has more detail:
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/usage/that-or-which

The link you provided is even more helpful. It has a lot of helpful information, thank you.
Death And Destruction Are Never Satisfied And Neither Are Human Eyes...Proverbs 27: 20
User avatar
EvaDar
Previous Member of the Month
Posts: 2295
Joined: 18 Nov 2017, 11:21
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 122
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-evadar.html
Latest Review: Do Not Wish For A Pet Ostrich! by Sarina Siebenaler

Post by EvaDar »

Agnes098 wrote: 26 May 2019, 14:22
The link you provided is even more helpful. It has a lot of helpful information, thank you.
:tiphat:
sit in the ocean. it is one of the best medicines on the planet. – the water
-Nayyirah Waheed
Post Reply

Return to “International Grammar”