Which or That?
Moderator: Official Reviewer Representatives
-
- Posts: 328
- Joined: 16 Mar 2019, 05:42
- Currently Reading: The DC Comics Encyclopedia
- Bookshelf Size: 52
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-han26.html
- Latest Review: Man Mission by Eytan Uliel
Which or That?
- Fazzier
- Posts: 783
- Joined: 16 Jan 2019, 14:07
- Currently Reading: Secondary Break
- Bookshelf Size: 547
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-fazzier.html
- Latest Review: Planning for a Better, Greener Future by Peter Nelson
- EvaDar
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: 18 Nov 2017, 11:21
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 122
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-evadar.html
- Latest Review: Do Not Wish For A Pet Ostrich! by Sarina Siebenaler
The backpack that was found on the bus was red.
The clause that contains that is essential. If you remove the clause, the meaning of the sentence is not conveyed correctly.
The backpack was red.
The sentence is still grammatically correct, but it is not enough information. It is essential (restrictive) information that the backpack was found on the bus. Both elements are important and tell us that it was a red backpack that was found on the bus.
The backpack, which is red, was found on the bus.
This tells us a back pack was found on the bus, and the fact that it is red is additional information. The point is it was left on the bus. You can remove the which clause and the sentence still conveys the information correctly (non-restrictive).
The backpack was found on the bus.
This link has more detail:
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/usage/that-or-which
-Nayyirah Waheed
- Dawud Adaviruku
- Posts: 321
- Joined: 26 Feb 2019, 15:31
- Currently Reading: Holding Fire
- Bookshelf Size: 94
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-dawud-adaviruku.html
- Latest Review: Reconfigurement by E. Alan Fleischauer
Thank you for sharing this detailed explanations. It's great.Eva Darrington wrote: ↑17 Mar 2019, 14:41 This question has to do with restrictive and non-restrictive clauses. The following link is good as it addresses British and American styles. Basically, if the clause contains essential information (restrictive), that would be used. If non-essential (non-restrictive), then which is used. With which, a comma is usually needed.
The backpack that was found on the bus was red.
The clause that contains that is essential. If you remove the clause, the meaning of the sentence is not conveyed correctly.
The backpack was red.
The sentence is still grammatically correct, but it is not enough information. It is essential (restrictive) information that the backpack was found on the bus. Both elements are important and tell us that it was a red backpack that was found on the bus.
The backpack, which is red, was found on the bus.
This tells us a back pack was found on the bus, and the fact that it is red is additional information. The point is it was left on the bus. You can remove the which clause and the sentence still conveys the information correctly (non-restrictive).
The backpack was found on the bus.
This link has more detail:
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/usage/that-or-which
- Renu G
- Posts: 753
- Joined: 06 Mar 2019, 01:32
- Currently Reading: Masters and Bastards
- Bookshelf Size: 144
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-renu-g.html
- Latest Review: The Roving Mind: A Modern Approach to Cognitive Enhancement by Anthony Simola
- roxy60sweet
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 27 Feb 2018, 13:00
- Currently Reading: The Mistress
- Bookshelf Size: 14
- Bukari
- Posts: 567
- Joined: 04 Feb 2018, 15:59
- Currently Reading: Everything Solid Has a Shadow
- Bookshelf Size: 99
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-bukari.html
- Latest Review: Days of the Giants by RJ Petrella
-
- Posts: 837
- Joined: 24 Dec 2018, 03:20
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 424
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-agnes-masobeng.html
- Latest Review: Man Mission by Eytan Uliel
EvaDar wrote: ↑17 Mar 2019, 14:41 This question has to do with restrictive and non-restrictive clauses. The following link is good as it addresses British and American styles. Basically, if the clause contains essential information (restrictive), that would be used. If non-essential (non-restrictive), then which is used. With which, a comma is usually needed.
The backpack that was found on the bus was red.
The clause that contains that is essential. If you remove the clause, the meaning of the sentence is not conveyed correctly.
The backpack was red.
The sentence is still grammatically correct, but it is not enough information. It is essential (restrictive) information that the backpack was found on the bus. Both elements are important and tell us that it was a red backpack that was found on the bus.
The backpack, which is red, was found on the bus.
This tells us a back pack was found on the bus, and the fact that it is red is additional information. The point is it was left on the bus. You can remove the which clause and the sentence still conveys the information correctly (non-restrictive).
The backpack was found on the bus.
This link has more detail:
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/usage/that-or-which
The link you provided is even more helpful. It has a lot of helpful information, thank you.
- EvaDar
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: 18 Nov 2017, 11:21
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 122
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-evadar.html
- Latest Review: Do Not Wish For A Pet Ostrich! by Sarina Siebenaler
-Nayyirah Waheed