Comma or not - again!
Moderator: Official Reviewer Representatives
- Davequa
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 21 Feb 2019, 13:35
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 2
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-davequa.html
- Latest Review: 30th Century: Escape (General Audience Edition) by Mark Kingston Levin PhD
Comma or not - again!
I would appreciate some guidance with the following sentences.
a) In the final section he gives us some useful advice.
or
In the final section, he gives us some useful advice.
b) In this day and age we are constantly bombarded with information.
or
In this day and age, we are constantly bombarded with information.
c) In doing so he looks at the science behind the claims.
or
In doing so, he looks at the science behind the claims.
To my mind, a comma is not needed in any of the above sentences but I'm slowly arguing myself around in circles.
Some help would be greatly appreciated.
- MrsCatInTheHat
- Posts: 3817
- Joined: 31 May 2016, 11:53
- Favorite Book: Cry the Beloved Country
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 376
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-mrscatinthehat.html
- Latest Review: Marc Marci by Larry G. Goldsmith
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
- Publishing Contest Votes: 0
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 22 Apr 2019, 14:30
- Currently Reading: Labyrinth
- Bookshelf Size: 12
In the final section, (pause) he gives us some useful advice.
In this day and age, (pause) we are constantly bombarded with information.
etc.
Notice the use of commas in my writing above, then mentally take them out and read through the sentence. Is it harder to understand without the correct punctuation to separate clauses? I think so. Even look at your own post:
¨To my mind, a comma is not needed...¨ This is correct!
- CinWin
- Posts: 565
- Joined: 29 Apr 2018, 18:42
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 311
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-cinwin.html
- Latest Review: The Crystilleries of Echoland by Dew Pellucid
- Brendan Donaghy
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 1096
- Joined: 18 Jan 2019, 13:14
- Currently Reading: Small Great Things
- Bookshelf Size: 141
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-brendan-donaghy.html
- Latest Review: Teetering On A Tightrope by Steven W Wilson
That's a very useful way of looking at it. I often think that grammar should be taught by way of examples like that, as it makes it easier to understand and much more likely to stick. I like the one that helps people determine whether its 'Joe and I ' or 'Joe and me': forget about whether it's the subject of the sentence, or the object of the sentence, simply remember to remove the named person and see how the sentence reads. 'She gave it to Joe and I' might sound reasonable, but 'she gave it to I' sounds silly. Likewise, 'Joe and me went to the shops' becomes 'Me went to the shops', which sounds reasonable only if it's being said by a 3 year old.
- CinWin
- Posts: 565
- Joined: 29 Apr 2018, 18:42
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 311
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-cinwin.html
- Latest Review: The Crystilleries of Echoland by Dew Pellucid
Exactly! I agree with you 100%!Brendan Donaghy wrote: ↑03 May 2019, 09:17That's a very useful way of looking at it. I often think that grammar should be taught by way of examples like that, as it makes it easier to understand and much more likely to stick. I like the one that helps people determine whether its 'Joe and I ' or 'Joe and me': forget about whether it's the subject of the sentence, or the object of the sentence, simply remember to remove the named person and see how the sentence reads. 'She gave it to Joe and I' might sound reasonable, but 'she gave it to I' sounds silly. Likewise, 'Joe and me went to the shops' becomes 'Me went to the shops', which sounds reasonable only if it's being said by a 3 year old.