Official Review: When The Eagle Strikes by Ronald Gaffney

Please use this forum to discuss historical fiction books. Common definitions define historical fiction as novels written at least 25-50 years after the book's setting.
Forum rules
Authors and publishers are not able to post replies in the review topics.
Post Reply
User avatar
CataclysmicKnight
Posts: 912
Joined: 26 Jan 2015, 19:51
Favorite Book: Ready Player One
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 1693
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-cataclysmicknight.html
Latest Review: Simple Man Simple Message by Mark Dobosz

Official Review: When The Eagle Strikes by Ronald Gaffney

Post by CataclysmicKnight »

[Following is an official OnlineBookClub.org review of "When The Eagle Strikes" by Ronald Gaffney.]
Book Cover
3 out of 4 stars
Share This Review


Bryan Hawkins had already seen his share of war thanks to the French and Indian War. With this experience behind him, when people started discussing rebellion in America in the 1770s, Bryan wasn't exactly happy. In fact, while many of those around him had decided a revolt of some sort was necessary, he didn't hesitate to say that he was loyal to King George and that what they were discussing was treason.

This talk eventually led to what's now known as the American Revolutionary War. Bryan's previous experience with war meant that he was called upon once again, pulling him away from his family. Bryan had skills as a ranger, making him a valuable asset for spying and missions that required stealth. But as Bryan deals with tensions between people he used to consider friends and neighbors, people and places he knows from the French and Indian War, and allegiances with Native American tribes that could side with the rebels or the loyalists (those, like Bryan, who sided with Britain), his family must maintain the farm and home that he left behind.

When The Eagle Strikes (author's capitalization) by Ronald E. Gaffney sounded like a book that would be right up my alley. I love historical fiction, and learning more about the American Revolution from a fictional character sounded amazing. Not only that, Ronald put a unique spin on it by showing things from the point of view of a loyalist, which was very different from the viewpoint we Americans are shown in history class. Despite his choice of side, the book is still fair about the actions of both sides. For example, the British use a tactic called "impressment" in which they would trick civilians into secluded areas and then beat them until they agreed to join the Royal Navy. These men wouldn't even get the chance to say goodbye to their loved ones, they'd merely go missing.

Unfortunately, it felt like over half of the book was an external look at events. The book is written as if Bryan is recording these events in a book even though he took no part in them. I often struggled to remember the names of the major players in the war, the locations where events occurred, and who was on which side.

On the bright side, the scenes that are from Bryan's point of view are excellent. Ronald has skill with building tension, setting a scene, and throwing the reader right into the middle of events. Bryan takes part in holding a fort against rebels, deals with neighbors who are quick to punish him and his family for the side he chose, and sees great victories and terrible tragedies. If the book was Bryan's tale of events during the war with the other events quickly filled in, I would've enjoyed it far more.

I'd give When The Eagle Strikes 2.5 stars if I could. Because I enjoyed myself overall and heartily recommend it to people who enjoy American history, my rating of the book is 3 out of 4 stars. It's worth mentioning that the events of the French and Indian War are covered in the first book in this series, Fire Over Arcadia. I haven't read that book, and while places and events from it are mentioned, I had no problem at all following along. Finally, while there are over a dozen errors in the book, they rarely affected my reading experience.

******
When The Eagle Strikes
View: on Bookshelves | on Amazon
Nothing is true, everything is permitted.
User avatar
Amanda Deck
Previous Member of the Month
Posts: 587
Joined: 02 Jun 2018, 21:00
Currently Reading: A Sight For Psychic Eyes
Bookshelf Size: 113
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-amanda-deck.html
Latest Review: Winds of Fall by Alberto Mercado

Post by Amanda Deck »

Hearing accounts from the other side of normal is always so interesting! I had a history teacher in school that made sure we students considered points of view from more than one side. Like the German soldiers and civilians fighting for their nation, the settlers attacked or kidnapped by native Americans, ancient Chinese closing their borders against foreign influence, etc. I admit, though, it's much easier to have opinions when you only accept one side.
Maybe looking at this as a history text that ends up being way more interesting than expected would be better than as a novel that's too much like a documentary. Just trying to look at the book from the other point of view. :)
Nikolas Farmakis
Posts: 786
Joined: 29 Sep 2019, 04:18
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 285
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-nickolas-farmakis.html
Latest Review: Cynthia and Dan by Dorothy May Mercer

Post by Nikolas Farmakis »

I think you have critically assessed the book. I also think your rating is fair and objective.
Post Reply

Return to “Historical Fiction”