How do you define a classic?

Please use this sub-forum to discuss any classic books or any very old fiction books or series.
Forum rules
Authors and publishers are not able to post replies in the review topics.
User avatar
Jaime Lync
Posts: 1426
Joined: 15 Mar 2017, 19:33
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 120
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jaime-lync.html
Latest Review: You Are A Christian. NOW WHAT? by James Rondinone

How do you define a classic?

Post by Jaime Lync »

I feel that the Classics refer to a list of books that were written a set time ago and are still memorable to date. But is that really what a classic is? How old does a book have to be to be considered a classic? Is a book written in the 1980's not a classic whereas one written in the 1970s is one? Will great books of modern time be considered classics after 20-30 years?
User avatar
CarrieMe
Posts: 107
Joined: 06 Mar 2017, 14:31
Bookshelf Size: 357
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-carrieme.html
Latest Review: "Away From The Sun" by Rebecca brisbane

Post by CarrieMe »

This is a really interesting question and I wish I had a good answer for it! I would say that age itself doesn't make a classic. In my opinion, a classic should be a book that has a major impact on the society of the time AND is timeless enough to speak to future generations. I feel like we probably need to give a book at least 10 years (maybe 20) before we can determine what kind of longevity it'll have. I definitely think that many of our modern great books definitely have the potential to be considered classics eventually.
Latest Review: "Away From The Sun" by Rebecca brisbane
User avatar
Manang Muyang
Previous Member of the Month
Posts: 11160
Joined: 02 May 2017, 20:17
Favorite Book:
Currently Reading: Donny and Mary Grace's California Adventures
Bookshelf Size: 685
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-manang-muyang.html
Latest Review: Your Great Name by Shawn Funk
Reading Device: B00KC6I06S

Post by Manang Muyang »

That is a difficult question. Google to the rescue. Wikipedia defines a classic as "a book accepted as being exemplary or noteworthy, for example through an imprimatur such as being listed in a list of great books, or through a reader's personal opinion." A lengthy discussion follows as different authors from time immemorial have their own views.
User avatar
Jaime Lync
Posts: 1426
Joined: 15 Mar 2017, 19:33
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 120
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jaime-lync.html
Latest Review: You Are A Christian. NOW WHAT? by James Rondinone

Post by Jaime Lync »

Thanks for your views CarrieMe and Miriam. It sounds like you can have instant classics.
User avatar
Gingerbo0ks
Posts: 735
Joined: 19 Mar 2017, 13:59
Currently Reading: All the Crooked Saints
Bookshelf Size: 168
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-gingerbo0ks.html
Latest Review: "Strong Heart" by Charlie Sheldon
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Post by Gingerbo0ks »

I agree with some of the above, to me it's about being timeless, the book needs to have a message or an impact that will affect generations to come, as well as making a mark during it's time.
"One must always be careful of books, and what is inside them, for words have the power to change us.”
― Cassandra Clare, Clockwork Angel
Latest Review: "Strong Heart" by Charlie Sheldon
User avatar
ErinLynn917
Posts: 6
Joined: 21 Apr 2017, 04:06
Bookshelf Size: 20
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-erinlynn917.html
Latest Review: "The Immigrant's Lament" by Mois benarroch

Post by ErinLynn917 »

I have to agree with you guys on the time factor. There are definitely books that can be instant classics (The Book Thief, by Markus Zusak or The Handmaiden's Tale, by Margaret Atwood come to mind.

But I think their is also collective societal decision behind a book becoming a classic. For example Moby Dick, by Herman Melville is considered a classic, but Melville's other publications are often ignored. Somewhere in the past, the literary world decided that Moby Dick was worthy of the title of "classic", and Melville's other works were not.

Additionally, I think there are works that are considered classics because of when they were written, or rather because of their survival. Nearly everything that has survived intact from Greco-Roman times is considered to be a classic. These sources are useful, and they do tell us a lot about life in ancient times, but sometimes I have to think they are "classics" solely because they are the only surviving works from the time period.
Latest Review: "The Immigrant's Lament" by Mois benarroch
User avatar
Storygamer88
Posts: 232
Joined: 02 Jun 2017, 05:32
Currently Reading: The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time
Bookshelf Size: 365
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-storygamer88.html
Latest Review: "A Town Called Gonefor" by Wesley Cris
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Post by Storygamer88 »

To me, it has to be older, at least 5 years+ but preferably 10-20 years or more (though some/most classics are hundreds of years old). Classics should usually have some timelessness about them - something that makes them special or memorable through the ages - a moral, a clever spin or tale, or some other unique quirk that distinguishes from the riffraff, in my opinion.
Hi all. I like board games, card games, video games, books (especially children's books and mysteries), stories, cartoons, anime, manga, light novels, animation, and other light-hearted, fun things. Feel free to message if you want to chat!
Latest Review: "A Town Called Gonefor" by Wesley Cris
User avatar
NickLock
Posts: 15
Joined: 15 May 2017, 06:30
Currently Reading: The Complete Sherlock Holmes
Bookshelf Size: 15
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-nicklock.html
Latest Review: "The 11.05 Murders" by Brian O'Hare
Reading Device: B00G2Y4WNY

Post by NickLock »

That's an interesting question. One that I'm still thinking about.

The first thought that came to mind was a classic is something that kid's would be assigned to read in middle and high schools. :shifty: But, to go farther than that, I would say that a classic is a book that would be enjoyed by many across multiple generations. Despite the change in language, in thinking, and lifestyle, a classic can still entertain its readers and the readers can still relate to the story.
Latest Review: "The 11.05 Murders" by Brian O'Hare
User avatar
Katherine Smith
Posts: 1463
Joined: 30 Mar 2017, 10:56
Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... 524">Nancy Drew</a>
Currently Reading: The Complete Tales and Poems of Edgar Allen Poe
Bookshelf Size: 504
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-katherine-smith.html
Latest Review: "Whisky tango foxtrot...copy" by John regan
Reading Device: B01KVZV52A

Post by Katherine Smith »

I would define a classic book by its content not by its age. A classic book is one whose theme continues to be relevant long after it was published. A classic book could talk about the dangers of government corruption or the complexities of the human spirit.
Latest Review: "Whisky tango foxtrot...copy" by John regan
SilviaP21
Posts: 115
Joined: 29 Apr 2017, 07:28
Bookshelf Size: 18
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-silviap21.html
Latest Review: "That Place of Knowledge" by Philip Alan Shalka

Post by SilviaP21 »

I totally agree. I think that the message of the book is much more important than when it was written. If people are still impressed by it and if they find themselves in those pages, it can be considered a classic. Who knows? Maybe in a few years "Hunger games" or "Harry Potter" will be cosidered classics too.
Latest Review: "That Place of Knowledge" by Philip Alan Shalka
User avatar
shish_by_design
Posts: 327
Joined: 07 Mar 2017, 02:44
Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... 66">Strong Heart</a>
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 54
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-shish-by-design.html
Latest Review: We are Voulhire: The Fires of Virko by Matthew Tysz
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Post by shish_by_design »

a great book, one written so well and covers issues of the past and present that can also be applied in the future. A book that, for lack of better words, can only be described as priceless. Its a treasure
User avatar
ValEtt
Posts: 18
Joined: 28 Jun 2017, 17:34
Bookshelf Size: 104
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-valett.html
Latest Review: "Murders in Progress" by Eldon Cene

Post by ValEtt »

This is an interesting question, and one I think readers and writers alike will always grapple with. In my mind, classics are often defined by their place in the literary canon. In academic settings, books that are part of the literary canon have been studied and evaluated over time and determined to have some inherent, lasting value. This is a dissatisfying measurement, however, because it both implies that there must be some unnamed elite group deciding what's canon, and necessitates an unspecified length of time after publication before classic status can be gained. I think there are newer books, or books that have traditionally been seen as genre/pop fare, that are just as deserving of classic status as the books we studied in school.
Latest Review: "Murders in Progress" by Eldon Cene
User avatar
MrsCatInTheHat
Posts: 3817
Joined: 31 May 2016, 11:53
Favorite Book: Cry the Beloved Country
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 376
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-mrscatinthehat.html
Latest Review: Marc Marci by Larry G. Goldsmith
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
Publishing Contest Votes: 0

Post by MrsCatInTheHat »

I would think a classic needs to have a sense of timelessness to it. A good number of people in every era will find value in a true classic.
Life without a good book is something MrsCatInTheHat cannot imagine.
User avatar
raikyuu
Posts: 303
Joined: 28 Jun 2017, 21:19
Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... =3079">The Republic</a>
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 95
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-raikyuu.html
Latest Review: Who killed Chatunga? by Muvhaki Tasu

Post by raikyuu »

If one would attempt to define "classic" outside of academic institutions, I think Jorge Sette does a good job in giving an idea on what a "classic" is from his "What do Classic Novels Have in Common?".
-rk
User avatar
Anirudh Badri
Posts: 261
Joined: 03 Jun 2017, 14:49
Currently Reading: Quiet
Bookshelf Size: 47
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-anirudh-badri.html
Latest Review: Galactic Passages: Planet 6333 by Dean and Anson Vargo

Post by Anirudh Badri »

Books released more than 30 years ago, which were written with a message or a story that went beyond the specific context of the time and place it was written in.
It is what you read when you don’t have to that determines what you will be when you can’t help it.

–Oscar Wilde
Post Reply

Return to “Classic Books”