Does the book change your religeous beliefs?
NOTICE: The author of this book was invited to participate in the discussion in this forum about his book. You should expect that the author is reading and may reply to posts made in this forum.
While the forums typically have a rule against authors/publishers talking about their own book on the forums at all as a way to prevent spam, an author discussing their own book in the dedicated discussion forum about that book is an exception and is allowed, including posting would-be self-promotional links to his book or related material insofar as is relevant to the discussion.
However, other forum rules and standards, such as those requiring upmost civility and politeness, are of course still in effect.
- LinaMueller
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: 09 Jun 2019, 13:22
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 261
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-linamueller.html
- Latest Review: The Wingless Fairy by Kye Strothers
Re: Does the book change your religeous beliefs?
You an I, tonight!
You may forget the warmth he gave,
I will forget the light.
When you have done, pray tell me
That I my thoughts may dim;
Haste! lest while you're lagging.
I may remember him!
Emily Dickinson
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 18 May 2019, 18:54
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 18
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-tommi.html
- Latest Review: Burn Zones by Jorge P. Newbery
-
- Posts: 602
- Joined: 15 Jul 2018, 22:12
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Brandy C
- Posts: 107
- Joined: 28 Jan 2019, 23:11
- Currently Reading: A Discovery of Witches
- Bookshelf Size: 33
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-brandy-c.html
- Latest Review: Cynthia and Dan by Dorothy May Mercer
I believe the question was if the book changed your views. My answer is simple and that answer is still no. I still believe if you're strong in your faith nothing will shake that. I'm not debating one religion over another or which religion is ”right”.Sahansdal wrote: ↑12 Jun 2019, 22:00What if that book is conclusive? You still would believe the Bible is "Holy"?Brandy C wrote: ↑01 May 2019, 12:46I totally agree! If the book changes your beliefs then you already had doubts and were leaning that way. If your faith is strong nothing will change or shake it.Balazon2000 wrote: ↑01 May 2019, 10:56 If one book could change your religious outlook then, in my opinion you are not strong in your faith. So, the answer to the question, for me, is no.
-
- Posts: 602
- Joined: 15 Jul 2018, 22:12
- Bookshelf Size: 0
What if you saw the savior in the flesh, the savior for all alive today, would that interest you? I guess not. Seeing would not be believing, right? Petalumaprogram.orgBrandy C wrote: ↑20 Jun 2019, 11:03I believe the question was if the book changed your views. My answer is simple and that answer is still no. I still believe if you're strong in your faith nothing will shake that. I'm not debating one religion over another or which religion is ”right”.
-
- Posts: 602
- Joined: 15 Jul 2018, 22:12
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Melissa Breen
- Posts: 153
- Joined: 12 Mar 2018, 10:12
- Currently Reading: World War Z
- Bookshelf Size: 34
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-melissa-breen.html
- Latest Review: We are Voulhire: Someone Else's End by Matthew Tysz
-
- Posts: 602
- Joined: 15 Jul 2018, 22:12
- Bookshelf Size: 0
It is only in the last 30 yrs that we have had the Nag Hammadi Library, the Gospel of Judas and the Dead Sea Scrolls rightly interpreted. In fact, I am the first to do it for the Gospel of Judas and the Apocalypses of James and Peter. Think about that! For 1800 years -- nothing. Now we have the Scrolls with PAUL as "Spouter of Lying" and the Essene origins of blood salvation inverted from blood purity observances at Qumran (Dr. Robert Eisenman's findings) and the readily visible gnostic origins of The Betrayal narrative of the canonical Gospels! That's quite a seismic event for the viability of the Christian message.Melissa Breen wrote: ↑23 Jun 2019, 19:37 I'm not religious but I think if I was it wouldn't change anything. It's just one book vs. Thousands of years of writings. It's interesting to read but I feel like there'd need to be a lot more proof to give people pause
- Jgideon
- Posts: 667
- Joined: 03 Apr 2018, 03:37
- Favorite Book: Gates to Tangier
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 253
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jgideon.html
- Latest Review: Sundays with Sister ssj by Anthony Happy LaRiccia
- Mouricia Allen
- Posts: 396
- Joined: 01 Jan 2018, 15:49
- Currently Reading: Covet (Fallen Angels Series #1)
- Bookshelf Size: 79
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-mouricia25.html
- Latest Review: The Life Inside Maggie Pincus by David I. Billingham
- Reading Device: B01N3UC27N
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 14 Mar 2019, 12:13
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 21
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-yasinta-venance34.html
- Latest Review: B-Side by Janis Jones
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
-
- Posts: 602
- Joined: 15 Jul 2018, 22:12
- Bookshelf Size: 0
The author here. I disagree, Mouricia. This is a new information not available before 1978. And it is examined in great detail by an expert in theology and literary analysis (me). I learned the former from a living Master, Maharaj Charan SIngh, and the latter from the expert of experts, Dr. Robert Eisenman. Can't get better credentials than that. I recommend to everyone that they read them both, a lot... www.scienceofthesul.org and http://roberteisenman.com/Mouricia25 wrote: ↑25 Jun 2019, 01:15 It's an interesting argument, but it's just another opinion that I will not make my own.
The information Dr. Eisenman and I present is of the uttermost importance to the world at large, and to a third its population as believers.
-
- Posts: 602
- Joined: 15 Jul 2018, 22:12
- Bookshelf Size: 0
It isn't a novel. I show that there is a definite literary connection between the Apocalypses of James and the canon, and that there is only one way it could have come about -- the copying and inverting of the gnostic originals. That is a monumental finding for the veracity of the Bible.
-
- Posts: 602
- Joined: 15 Jul 2018, 22:12
- Bookshelf Size: 0
Vickie,Vickie Noel wrote: ↑02 May 2019, 21:19 The solid Bible knowledge I'd acquired cannot be undermined by this book. As the Bible puts it, "To the making of many books, there is no end."- Ecclesiastes 12:12 (NWT). I'm not surprised that such a book as this has arisen to malign to words in the Holy Scriptures, but I ask myself one question, "How far is the reach of this book? Can it stand the test of time, centuries, like the Bible? I'm quite certain it won't, for I wouldn't have known about its existence if I wasn't part of OBC, unlike the Bible which babies are promptly being taught about in all parts of the world, some even while in the womb! The latter part of the earlier quoted scripture says "...and much devotion to them is wearisome to the flesh." Simply put, it's not everything you should read. To me, this book is one of them. The words in the Bible, written aforetime and still practical in our modern life, are nothing short of supernatural. If such a book that survived thousands of generations states that Judas is the betrayer of Jesus, then no other book is fit to challenge that assertion.
There is real irony in your comments. This is the author. It always amazes me that Christians are quick to dismiss other books, but never the Bible, which is a book. Even the one you chose, Ecclesiastes, is one that tacitly condemns the New Testament: Ecc. 1:9, "There is nothing new under the sun." Or Hosea 6:6, "God desires mercy, not sacrifice." These verses cannot coexist with a NEW story of human sacrifice. My book may not end Christianity, but the evidence I am first to present will, in time.
-
- Posts: 602
- Joined: 15 Jul 2018, 22:12
- Bookshelf Size: 0
Would you care now to comment on the book? This has nothing to do with it. - the AuthorSorcPenz wrote: ↑26 May 2019, 15:37 I never understood how suicide was seen as such a sin in Christianity when one of the disciples had committed it himself in his despair. Although, his suicide on the tree now recalls to mind the suicide and hanging of Odin, which was meant as rebirth. But why would you blame Judas for suicide when he felt so guilty and awful about what he did? And then blame him about what he did to cause the guilt as well. It just seems like Judas is a bit of a punching bag. And I mean, I get it. The person we love went through something awful and we want to be mad at someone, we want to blame someone. It's human, and extraordinarily Christian too, weirdly enough. Blaming is strictly advised against, and yet Christians do it incessantly in their everyday lives...