THarveyReadALot wrote: ↑03 Aug 2019, 20:42
Sahansdal,
My, you have a lot of material there. I don't know how to contest this, but I know there is a way to do so. I need to show it to someone else. But be clear on this: I believe in the New Testament, but more importantly, in Jesus. Jesus is God's son. In Matthew 28, it says, 'Baptize them in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Jesus is equal with God the Father and the Holy Spirit. In Genesis 1, Moses, the human writer. quotes God as saying, 'Let Us make man in Our image'... The Trinity is displayed in Genesis 1 and In Matthew 28. Anther point, John 1 is about Jesus, not John the Baptist. People can only get to God through Jesus the Son as Jesus says in John 14. If I can't convince you, maybe I can convince others. But your destiny, eternal life is at stake.
Read a Lot,
No, sorry. You won't find a way to contest this. You are posting to a born-again born-again. I was for two years a 24/7 Evangelical in the 70's. I lived with brothers. We met every DAY to study the Bible. Now I have a living Master and meditate every day. You aren't going to change me. I have seen Christ from both sides now, the real one in person, as John 6:40 says to. I hear what you are saying from my dear cousin, who has given up on me. I try from time to time, knowing how persuasive the New Testament is. I won't get through to her, but I may to you. You can't know if you don't try. If you read Dr. Robert Eisenman, A JEW, so he isn't like me OR you, you might be more likely to understand this. He has firmly placed the identities of the 'Spouter of Lying' and 'Righteous Teacher' in the Dead Sea Scrolls Pesherim as Paul and James, respectively. I read all his work, 3000 pages, twice. His work is impeccable. He is easily the smartest man I know. His work has demolished Pauline blood salvation as a God-given doctrine. It came from the Essenes at Qumran. The details are a mammoth undertaking, so I can't cover it all here, but suffice to say, Pauline martyred Master salvation came from an inversion of Jamesian Jewish Christian blood PURITY observances. It was a contentious relationship between James and Paul, that ended in the trial of James and his death under the authority of "the Wicked Priest" Ananus ben Ananus, 66 CE. This precipitated the fall of Jerusalem in 70 CE and the beginning of the Diaspora.
The record of the killing of James the Just, the most prominent religious figure of his day, NOT Jesus, is covered in the Book of Acts by fictional 'Stephen' in Acts 7. Saul is Paul, and is present and approving of the killing. Many details in the narrative connect James to Stephen. Eisenman covers it all. It is the only reason the New Testament was written. James had to go, because he was a threat to Paul and his new movement. This is established history now. Only the Church community is unaware. Here is the apocryphal Pseudoclementine Recognitions 1.70:
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf08.v ... i.lxx.html
Note the word "headlong" --
also used by Luke in his rewriting of the story in Acts 1:18-23, with Judas falling headlong, just like James. James didn't die from the fall, but was stoned by the mob led by Paul. It was an embarrassing episode for the new Church that had to be covered up.
Jesus is NOT the Son. The Holy Spirit is. There is no Trinity. That was a ploy to elevate Jesus. They split the Son into two, the man and the Spirit, which cannot be done since they are one and the same. The Father is within, but not identical. The Word and the Master are ONE. Hebrew original Matthew has no Trinity at Matthew 28. See Douglas Del Tondo,
The Original Gospel of Matthew. The Bible is NOT the Word. The Holy Spirit is. John 3:16 is in past tense, and can't be about Jesus, who was supposedly "given" at death, not birth. John 1 is about succession, with John the Baptist as Master, then Jesus. There is NO JESUS in John 1:6-13. Take that to the bank. I learned it directly from a Master.
http://www.scienceofthesoul.org/product_p/en-056-0.htm Do you see "Jesus" in John 1:1-13? No. Similarly, John 13:31 is about James glorified as Judas, covering James, as he "goes out." Jesus immediately says that he is with them a "little while." So he is not talking about HIMSELF. James is the covered successor. Jesus was supposedly, again, 'glorified' at death. Right? Are you getting this?
You simply have to educate yourself more from outside of the Bible! The OT is just fine. The NT is the most compelling Lie every conceived. Three BILLION people have simply been deceived by Church elders who likely commissioned the writing of the Gospels and Acts, for the express purpose of concealing the coming of the successor, James the Just -- 'Judas' in the Gospels and Acts 1. There was no other reason for its composition. It is A LIE. Masters come all the time. and wherever they are needed to find those ready for them. They have come to this world since at least as early as SETH. Genesis 4:26 is the first record of an initiating Master. "When me began calling on the Name of the Lord." The Name of the Lord isn't Yahweh, or Jesus, but WORD. The Word is an ethereal Presence within. It has NOTHING TO DO with written or spoken words. It is Apophasis Logos, meaning said without being spoken. That's what Gnostics called the Holy Spirit. This may sound strange and foreign to you, but that is only because the intent of these writers has been fulfilled. They have succeeded in deceiving YOU. Masters find their disciples, not the other way around. It isn't common. But it does happen. I am here telling you about them. You do what you want about it.
www.rssb.org is your connection if you want it.
I can answer any question. I am your friend. Read a Lot. If you really want to learn, I can help you. I can show you where real salvation is found. It is far more beautiful than anything in Christianity. I know, because I was a Christian myself.
Oh, if you need more, there is plenty. Did you read my book? The denials of Peter are denials BY Jesus OF Peter, not the reverse as in the Gospels. Here it pertains to seeing within in mystic meditation, and Peter not being ready. This just happens to be the same inversion m. o. that Eisenman found in the Scrolls for the Pauline blood salvation inversion. Are you seeing the pattern? The BIBLE INVERTED the true Gnostic original story, or the true Essene story. It happens. History is made of such uncomfortable truths.
http://gnosis.org/naghamm/apopet.html (First paragraph, last line)
