How much science with your fiction?

Discuss the June 2017 Book of the Month, Superhighway by Alex Fayman. Superhighway is the first book in the Superhighway Trilogy, so feel free to use this forum to discuss not only the first book but also the other books in the series.

View Superhighway on Bookshelves
User avatar
Posts: 186
Joined: 11 Sep 2017, 16:00
2017 Reading Goal: 0
Currently Reading: Island of the Gods
Bookshelf Size: 23
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: Marrying a Playboy Billionaire by H M Irwing

Re: How much science with your fiction?

Post by eelavahs-jay » 28 Sep 2017, 12:49

I started reading Island of the Gods and the author lost me as soon as he started talking about an elaborate information system that the main character had cracked. If you're going to invent something explain it using terminologies familiar to the masses first. I'm all for science in fiction but when it's not over the top. I love biotechnology (I wanted to be a gene therapist) but I know not to carelessly drop words/phrases like "electrophoresis" or "reverse transcriptase poltymerase chain reaction" when explaining how a creature was created in a lab. It's a huge turn off when a novel becomes a college textbook.

User avatar
Doaa Wael
Posts: 216
Joined: 20 Sep 2017, 11:59
2017 Reading Goal: 10
Bookshelf Size: 23
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: "My Trip To Adele" by R.I.Alyaseer and A. I Alyaseer

Post by Doaa Wael » 01 Oct 2017, 14:19

I love it when there is a scientific explanation as I don't believe that things simply happen. there must be a reason but we don't see it right away or maybe not at all. so if the author reveals the reason, possibly with making us curious and intrigued about the reason, that would be great.
Imagination Trumps Reality.
Latest Review: "My Trip To Adele" by R.I.Alyaseer and A. I Alyaseer

User avatar
Posts: 245
Joined: 05 Jun 2017, 09:49
Bookshelf Size: 18
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: "The Elf Brief" by Jordan David

Post by Anjum » 31 Oct 2017, 04:58

I like it when there is some real science in the story, otherwise it just goes over my head.
Latest Review: "The Elf Brief" by Jordan David

User avatar
Posts: 89
Joined: 06 Dec 2017, 03:07
2018 Reading Goal: 120
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 0
2017 Reading Goal: 5
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 120
Currently Reading: Ronaldo: Rudi's Birthday Extravaganza
Bookshelf Size: 80
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: "And Then I Met Margaret" by Rob White

Post by David_92 » 15 Dec 2017, 07:39

The science fiction book called 'Heaven and Earth ' has a section of facts to educate the reader on some scientific aspects that are in the book theme.
The role of fiction books is and has always been to open our imaginations.
Latest Review: "And Then I Met Margaret" by Rob White

User avatar
Posts: 281
Joined: 29 Jan 2018, 08:36
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 52
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: There and Back There Again by Andrew Alsup
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Post by Mailis » 10 Feb 2018, 15:19

I think sometimes too much science thrown in distracts from the story and emotional aspect of it and feels like you are being given a lecture about something that just tires you out.

User avatar
Posts: 495
Joined: 18 Jan 2018, 22:29
2019 Reading Goal: 30
2019 Reading Goal Completion: 3
2018 Reading Goal: 52
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 44
Currently Reading: Ready Player One
Bookshelf Size: 480
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Post by Sakilunamermaid » 24 Mar 2018, 20:35

This question reminds me of how I felt when I first read Frankenstein. I had such a want to read more scientific method but just got electric eels and one day the monster was alive. Science helps stories so much. I find when reading books featuring careers or methods I don't know about, it helps learning something about it. This is especially helpful with medical or investigation driven stories.

User avatar
Posts: 295
Joined: 15 Feb 2018, 11:11
2018 Reading Goal: 100
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 40
Favorite Book: Trip to Adele
Currently Reading: Split Adam
Bookshelf Size: 162
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: Devilish by Tricia Barr
Reading Device: 1400697484

Post by mamalui » 25 Mar 2018, 16:08

bluegreenmarina wrote:
02 Jun 2017, 09:49
Because sci-fi is not my top genre of choice I tend to prefer it be very "realistic" and based in solid science that at least make it sound plausible.
I agree.
No idea is a bad idea.

Life is what happens to you while you are busy making other plans.

Posts: 101
Joined: 01 Mar 2018, 01:32
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 19
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: Heartaches by H.M. Irwing

Post by atonykamau » 27 Mar 2018, 07:18

I think there needs to be an equal balance between science and fiction. Too much both will completely ruin the story.

User avatar
Posts: 406
Joined: 19 Mar 2018, 08:56
2019 Reading Goal: 25
2019 Reading Goal Completion: 56
2018 Reading Goal: 25
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 176
Currently Reading: When Angels Play Poker
Bookshelf Size: 1291
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: The Evolutionite Chronicles Book 2: Dagger and Shadow Ninja in: Welcome to Las Vegas by Timothy P. Callahan

Post by desantismt_17 » 06 Apr 2018, 08:18

I'm not turned off necessarily by books that gloss over the explanation for the science, but it's always nice when there is an explanation. That was one thing I really liked about Superhighway--the very scientific, but still easily understood, science behind the power. Another example that comes to mind is A Wrinkle in Time. L'Engle presented a very advanced physics concept in a children's book and explained it in such a way that I understood it when I first read the book as a kid. That is the mark of truly well-done science in scifi for me. I'm not scientificly minded, so if I need a technical manual to understand my fiction, odds are good I'll pick up a different book.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Post Reply

Return to “Discuss "Superhighway" by Alex Fayman”